Trump Terrorizes Iran for Defending Their Own Territory, Outright Lying to Provoke Tehran into War – The Millennium Report

~ Trump’s Apparent Lies Might Set off World War III ~

White House Pushes ‘Trump Pulled Back’ Story – He Doubtless By no means Accepted To Strike Iran

Moon of Alabama

Final night time U.S President Trump allegedly pulled again from a army strike towards Iran after it had already been ordered.

That is the official story however there are doubts that it’s true. The Iranian campaign of “maximum pressure” towards Trump’s sanctions continues to be on. However there are first signs that it is successful.

The New York Occasions headlines: Trump Approves Strikes on Iran, but Then Abruptly Pulls Back

WASHINGTON — President Trump authorised army strikes towards Iran in retaliation for downing an American surveillance drone, however pulled again from launching them on Thursday night time after a day of escalating tensions.As late as 7 p.m., army and diplomatic officers have been expecting a strike, after intense discussions and debate on the White Home among the many president’s prime national safety officers and congressional leaders, according to a number of senior administration officers involved in or briefed on the deliberations.

Officers stated the president had initially permitted assaults on a handful of Iranian targets, like radar and missile batteries.

The operation was underway in its early levels when it was referred to as off, a senior administration official stated. Planes have been in the air and ships have been in position, however no missiles had been fired when word got here to stand down, the official stated.

The NYT story blames the hawks in the Trump administration, Bolton, Pompeo and CIA torture queen Gina Haspel, for arguing for a strike. The Pentagon and some congressional leaders are stated to have been towards it. The NYT report consists of this curious paragraph:

Requested concerning the plans for a strike and the choice to maintain again, the White Home declined to comment, as did Pentagon officers. No authorities officers asked The New York Occasions to withhold the article.

The Associated Press has an analogous story: US prepped for strikes on Iran before approval was withdrawn. The Washington Publish and ABCNews additionally report along the similar line. The White House is clearly pushing this model of the story.

But not everyone is shopping for the claim of a planned assault that was referred to as back. Jeffrey Lewis, a scholar on worldwide conflicts, remarks:

Jeffrey Lewis @ArmsControlWonk – 3:43 UTC – 21 Jun 2019I don’t purchase this. Trump’s group is making an attempt to have it both methods — appearing restrained but talking robust. This is just about what Nixon did in 1969, too. Why not simply admit that typically restraint is sensible?

The @nytimes ran the same story Nixon in 1969. 🤷‍♂️ Nixon was not going to retaliate but he needed individuals to assume he virtually did — and the Gray Woman obliged. —> Aides Say Nixon Weighed Swift Korea Reprisal

Elijah Magnier, a journalist with wonderful sources in Tehran, also rejects the NYT claim. Pointing to the NYT story he remarks:

Elijah J. Magnier @ejmalrai – 4:02 UTC – 21 Jun 2019This is highly inaccurate and Iran “knew” about it yesterday: the US administration whispered this information for Trump to save his face.

I hinted to this information yesterday earlier than it was launched this morning by the US media. Iran – sources – rejected the “war-theatre scenario”. Extra particulars this evening.

Elijah J. Magnier @ejmalrai – 19:41 UTC – 20 Jun 2019I’ve very priceless info on US intel sending a message to the Iranians to agree on a sure state of affairs to happen.
This and rather more info will drive me to write an article tomorrow (hopefully) on #Iran and #US crisis.

After the drone shoot down the worth of oil jumped 10%. Trump may have observed that. He was additionally already warned by Iran that there isn’t any room for talks and that any strike towards it might have deadly penalties:

DUBAI (Reuters) – Iranian officials advised Reuters on Friday that Tehran had acquired a message from U.S. President Donald Trump via Oman overnight warning that a U.S. attack on Iran was imminent.

The second official stated: “We made it clear that the leader is against any talks, but the message will be conveyed to him to make a decision … However, we told the Omani official that any attack against Iran will have regional and international consequences.”

The entire storyline of “a strike was ordered but Trump held back and saved the day” may nicely be pretend.

When Trump spoke to the press yesterday afternoon he was already enjoying down the Iranian downing of a U.S. International Hawk drone. As we wrote in the update to yesterday’s drone story:

Trump just held a press convention in the Oval Office. He seemed to play down (vid) the occasion. He empathized that the drone was unmanned. He stated he had “a big, big feeling” that “someone made a mistake”, that “some Iranian general probably made a mistake”. That signifies that he does not accuse the government of Iran of the shoot down, however some lowly grunt who “might have made a mistake.”

That statement provides him room to avoid a large retaliation.

A strike in retaliation for the downed drone might have by no means been on the table. An alternate interpretation is that the U.S. sought agreement for a symbolic ‘strike’ from Iran. It might hit some empty desert place to permit Trump to save face. Iran would have disagreed with that plan.

But there are additionally signs that some strike was actually in preparation:

𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙄𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙡 𝘾𝙧𝙖𝙗 @IntelCrab – 3:26 UTC – 21 Jun 2019Unsure I’ve an opinion but on this NYT piece, however I’ll say one factor…the HF visitors we’ve seen at the moment is in step with the assertion that at the least SOME type of strike package deal was approved.

Uncommon High Frequency radio visitors pointed to strike preparation, says the open supply analyst IntelCrab.

There’s additionally a special plausible reason why an imminent strike may need been referred to as back. From the Wall Road Journal:

Saudi Plant Struck by Missile, Apparently From Yemen
Senior U.S. officials referred to as again to White Home after desalination facility in kingdom hit

Senior officers from a variety of U.S. authorities businesses have been referred to as again to the White House to meet Wednesday evening, the official stated.“The President has been briefed on the reports of a missile strike in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia,” White Home press secretary Sarah Sanders stated Wednesday. “We are closely monitoring the situation and continuing to consult with our partners and allies.”

The Houthi, aka Ansar Allah, yesterday hit the Saudi desalination and electricity plant at Al-Shuqaiq close to the southern Saudi city Jizan. The Saudis confirmed the strike:

Colonel Turki al-Maliki, the spokesperson for the Saudi-led coalition preventing Ansar Allah, confirmed the assault, saying a hostile projectile that had yet to be identified landed close to the Al-Shuqaiq water desalination plant, however brought on no casualties or injury. He added that it was another example of the rebels intentionally attacking civilian targets.

This should have come as a shock for the Saudis. Some 75% of the water the Saudis use comes from desalination crops. Their individuals will die of thirst when these get destroyed. Did the Saudi King call the White House and urge it to name off the strike towards Iran as a result of he feared for his water assets? Was this the actual cause why the White House referred to as again its advisors and canceled the strike?

The Houthi also launched an giant assault on Jizan airport:

Brasco_Aad @Brasco_Aad – 18:17 UTC – 20 Jun 2019Mass Houthi drone assault on Jizan airport tonight.
Saudi witnesses are reporting vital injury in and across the airport.

Flights to Jizan have been delayed after the reported strike.

The current Houthi hits on Saudi Arabia are notable escalations in their high quality and extent. The Houthi have obviously acquired new weapons. Their actions are part of the Iranian marketing campaign to put “maximum pressure” on Trump. As Abdel Bari Atwan writes:

The US’ Israeli and Gulf allies have been exploiting Trump’s stupidity to attempt to drag him into a struggle towards Iran on their behalf. The Iranians try to impress on him that any such conflict would incur an exorbitant value on the US, and in addition on these allies – Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah has warned that any warfare wouldn’t be confined to Iran but set the complete area ablaze.Even if there isn’t any direct US attack, the Iranians won’t simply sit again and wait to be starved into submission by Trump’s embargo and halting of their oil exports. That is another factor the US president does not perceive. And he might by no means understand it till he sees the extent of their retaliation towards his nation’s forces, warships and bases, and his allies’ cities, airports, and power and desalination crops.

Trump wages an financial warfare on Iran via sanctions on every thing Iran exports or imports. Iran is doing its greatest to to push again towards this by creating incidents which are plausibly deniable however put Trump beneath maximum strain. However there at the moment are indicators that Trump is lastly getting that.

Yesterday evening Tucker Carlson, a FOX Information host with a direct line to the White Home, had two robust anti-war segments on his present (vid). Within the second phase Carlson talks with retired army Colonel Douglas McGregor. Both argue for pulling again on sanctions. This was doubtless a preplanned change (at 9:56 min) designed to give Trump cover for his choice:

Carlson: Is there some good cause to keep this degree of sanctions towards Iran? Are we getting one thing out of that?McGregor: Properly, I feel the thought was to destroy the Iranian financial system to convey the nation to its knees. That’s actually not what we must be making an attempt to do at this level. I feel the president senses that there’s now a chance for diplomacy, for a brand new strategy to Iran that would deescalate this set of circumstances and produce a constructive end result.

Look, it will damage our financial system if we interact Iran in a struggle. Iran may have immediately have help from all over the world. They would be the victim of this “limited strike” that’s being mentioned. The restricted strike concept is sheer madness. It can provoke a warfare. Everyone, China, Russia, India, many European states will come to assistance from Iran. We’ll find yourself with a bigger coalition of the prepared towards us, than we have now seen in many years.

I feel the president has figured this out. He’s acquired good instincts. But he wants to eliminate the warmongers. He wants to throw these geniuses and their limited strikes out of the Oval Workplace. The final thing the America First agenda wants is a stupid pointless pointless struggle with Iran and he is aware of that and he wants to act.

[Tucker Carlson agrees]

Trump might properly need some diplomatic change with Iran. But Iran won’t speak to him as long as the sanctions towards it are stored in place. It should proceed its most strain marketing campaign by creating new incidents that may again improve the worth of oil. The easiest method out for Trump is to abolish sanctions towards Iran. He a minimum of should challenge waivers for China and others to permit them to again purchase Iranian oil.

Until he does so Iran will hit repeatedly towards those that press for conflict towards it. Yesterday it was a U.S. drone and a Saudi desalination plant that have been the targets. The next incident might be in some oil facility in the United Arab Emirates or a symbolic strike towards Israel.

The ball continues to be in Trump’s courtroom. He has to act further to keep away from a bigger struggle.